Monday, January 28, 2008

Lord Henry commented that John Edwards should drop out of the race, because if he doesn't, Hillary might win. I agree with his goals: it's vastly preferable for Hillary Clinton not to get the nomination. But I disagreed with his conclusion, saying that his idea only works if Edwards supporters would break disproportionately for Obama.

MSNBC has been asking Edwards supporters in exit polls who their second choice would be, and it's about evenly split (neither Obama nor Clinton has an advantage among those voting for Edwards). This means that Edwards can safely stay in the race and not affect the results, which is good, because he's driving the debate. Clinton and Obama want to talk about themselves, while Edwards is forcing the field to debate ideas and make proposals (even the Hillary-endorsing New York Times admits that much). More on this later, perhaps. It's too early to be smart.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Matt,

While its true that the exit polls say that Obama wouldn't have an advantage, I think that it isn't an accurate statistic for the following reason.

As you mentioned in the previous blogspot, virtually every undecided voter in SC voted for Obama. I believe this actually reflects a broader truth about Presidential Politics: namely that, WITH TIME, those who are undecided tend to gravitate towards the more "likeable" candidate.

Evidence for this theory is shown in almost every Presidential election. Reagan defeated Carter by a wide margin even though two weeks before the general election, the President had a slight edge. Clinton soundly crushed Bush even though he was trailing after the convention, and Bush similarly beat Gore in 2000. Notice that all of these results took time to accomplish; undecided voters only gravitated fairly last minute to the more likeable candidate.

This brings me back to the original point of discussion: Exit polls have no impact because people don't really think about their second choice all that much. But historically, dislikeable, non-charismatic politicians like Clinton usually win because of their core base, not because they pull away undecided voters. If Edwards dropped out today, voters would actually have some time before Super Tuesday to evaluate both these candidates, and history shows that at least the majority of them would end up voting for the more charismatic option. In a race this close, I think that outweighs listening to Edwards bleeding-heart healthcare discussion that no one will end up implementing anyway.

Anyway, screw all these guys. Bloomberg for President!

- Lord Henry